In a shocking
turn of events, David Mitchell has totally ignored my request that he should
write more historical novels. To rub it in even further, this novel, while
beginning in 1985, primarily takes place in the future. Once I’d got over my
disappointment, however, I was pleased to realise that The Bone Clocks is probably his best novel yet. Which is not to say
that it doesn’t still share in his usual strengths and weaknesses.
Holly Sikes is
fifteen years old and running away from home after she discovers the love of
her life sleeping with her best friend. However, this prosaic start to the
story becomes somewhat stranger when she encounters an old woman called Esther,
who asks her for ‘asylum’. Shortly afterwards, Holly is entangled in an
otherworldly scene where she’s lucky to escape with her life, and has her
memories wiped. Odd vocabulary – horologists, Black Wine, Cathars, the Shaded
Way – is dropped, but the reader is clearly unable to understand it yet.
Because this is a David Mitchell novel, we jump forward ten years to meet
obnoxious Cambridge undergraduate and fraudster Hugo Lamb, who sleeps with
Holly on a ski trip before becoming involved in a supernatural encounter of his
own. A series of narrators, all linked to Holly – a foreign correspondent, a
once-superstar novelist, and one of the mysterious Horologists – take us all
the way to 2046, where Holly, now an old woman, is struggling to survive in a
post-apocalyptic Ireland.
The Bone Clocks is an incredibly fun and gripping novel. I think
it’s the first of Mitchell’s novels to hold my attention consistently – which
is a major feat given how frequently he swaps viewpoints, styles and stories in
all of his fiction. However, it’s also exceedingly odd, even for Mitchell.
There’s a continuing conflict between the intense social observation that he
does so well via a number of his narrators, and the fantastic elements that
seem to be grafted on to their lives. The clash is most obvious in the sections
narrated by Ed – the foreign correspondent – and Crispin – the novelist. These
characters work so well because they feel so real; Ed gives a harrowing account
of his experiences as a reporter, but explains why he is addicted to the job, even
though he knows he is neglecting his wife and child. On the other end of the
spectrum, Crispin is a hilariously self-obsessed novelist who goes to
inordinate lengths to punish a reviewer who slated his ‘comeback’ book; he
verges on caricature, but becomes less stereotyped through his friendship with
Holly. Mitchell’s talents are on full display in these sections, but they don’t
work well with the rest of the novel. On the other hand, Hugo’s narrative and
the two Holly sections feel sufficiently removed from reality that they gel
better with the Horologist sub-plot. As for the remaining section of the novel,
where we finally learn what Black Wine and Cathars are… I’m not sure I know
what to make of it. It’s a great read, but again, it jars badly with the rest
of the text, and is essentially a pure fantasy romp, although Mitchell is
brilliant at using obscure jargon to create a threatening atmosphere. I was
left feeling that The Bone Clocks could
be edited into at least two novels – and lose very little from it – especially when
the Horologists are used to engineer a deus ex machina ending.
The other big
thing about The Bone Clocks is that
it’s an incredibly self-referential novel, which adds to the sense that
Mitchell is playing a game rather than writing serious fiction. I’m not a
committed enough Mitchell fan to spot all the references, but he makes some
pretty obvious; Hugo was a character in Black
Swan Green and Dr Marinus, one of the Horologists, hails from The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet.
There’s also been a lot of debate about real-world references in the novel; is Crispin a portrait of Martin Amis? Although there’s nothing wrong with such
references, I do always find them a bit cheap – it’s an easy trick to appear
clever – and it doesn’t help with the overall feel of the novel. In a way, none
of this matters. The Bone Clocks is
fantastically entertaining, and I would definitely recommend it. But sometimes
I wish David Mitchell would set a few more limitations on his impressive
imagination.
It's interesting that this was your favourite, whilst I found it my worst Mitchell. I think that shows he is dividing fans with his style. I was gripped to his earlier books, but really struggled with this one and ended up abandoning it. I want him to write more books in the style of Black Swan Green!
ReplyDeleteHi Jackie - I was just reading your review and meant to comment! Though I enjoyed The Bone Clocks, I definitely agree that Mitchell can be at his best when he puts more restrictions on himself. I liked Black Swan Green a lot because he forced himself to stay put with one character and one geographical area, and I would like to see more of that.
ReplyDelete