It is difficult to warm to this excellent novel, but
this is really a proof of its success. It’s genuinely disturbing, not in the
‘horror film’ sense, but because it disturbs the reader’s settled
pre-conceptions and leaves you not quite knowing where to settle them again.
Ray, Nathan and Serena are the three members of a BBC production crew who have
come to India to make a documentary about life in a ‘prison village’, a
rehabilitative experiment where prisoners who have behaved well during their
first years in jail are allowed to live under controlled conditions with their
families while they serve out the rest of their sentences. Ray, the central
character, straddles these two worlds uneasily – from North India originally,
she speaks fluent Hindi and refers to herself as ‘veg’, a shorthand for
religious and clean-living – but actually, although she can’t quite accept
this, has much more in common with the other privileged Westerners.
As the documentary is filmed, the theme of voyeurism
becomes so strong that it almost seems a little laboured. Ray is continually
imagining scenes in terms of camera angles or close-ups, or actually taking
random shots through her viewfinder. And Lalwani does not only focus on the
visual element of filmmaking – dialogue is also key. Ray is aware of the
mistranslations that are fed to Serena and Nathan, but despite being able to
speak to the villagers directly, she is constantly aware that she’s not really
sure what they are saying. At one point, acting as translator for Nathan when
he interviews a village boy, she alters both sides of the conversation as if
she is editing a tape, re-imagining what Nathan ought to have asked and what
the boy ought to have said. Although this works well in demonstrating the
increasingly shaky morality of what the documentary crew are doing, I felt that
the dubiousness of their work perhaps shouldn’t have been so obvious from the
start. A more gradual realisation might have brought the point home even more
strongly, and the fact that Nathan, Serena and even Ray are all so
unsympathetic doesn’t help.
Despite this slight flaw, Lalwani does a masterly job
at dissecting Ray’s character even as Ray tries to dissect those around her and
find out ‘their true stories’, demonstrating her lack of self-knowledge. Ray
distances herself from the other two film-makers throughout most of the novel
by protesting that she has nobler motives, that she wants to show a UK audience
that India can be forward-thinking in terms of justice and highlight the
suffering endured by some of the prisoners in their previous lives, but it is
evident she is fooling herself when she thinks she would like to be able to
secretly film her subjects through special glasses (banned because of the
ethical questions they raise). Ultimately, Ray demands truth from the villagers
but lies to them about who she really is. While complaining that they are
putting on a show for the cameras and aren’t being ‘natural’, she fails to see
that she is putting on a show for them; trying to fit in with what they expect
her to be even though she has rejected this ideal in her English life.
Though uncompromisingly bleak, this thought-provoking
novel is genuinely gripping and all too brief. And if you enjoyed Lalwani’s
take on how we present and reimagine ourselves to suit others, I would
recommend Jennifer Egan’s Look At Me, which deals with similar themes in a
very different context.
No comments:
Post a Comment